| There are 13 comments on this blog. |
|
|
What, you got the dog ears?
|
|
|
There was a 3.2 in Loma Linda 2026/06/09 09:36:58 AM PDT (16:36:58 UTC)
CalTech website is best source. First link below.
You can also save the second link below to your phone to do a quick Did You Feel It report any time you feel an earthquake.
|
|
|
U must be new. If it's not a 6 it's not worth looking up
|
|
|
Thanks Randy .
After all these years the Badlands fault has become active.
Nope, lived though Northridge and the other one, Landers too.
.
|
|
|
We just felt one in Vegas the other day
|
|
|
the ie has been rockin and rollin all day today
|
|
|
Mag 3.2?
Philippines says hold my beer. 7.8 Magnitude in Mindanao
|
|
|
As an actual person in the geosciences, I can say that predicting bigger earthquakes from earthquakes is incredibly difficult. We do not have enough sample data to make refined predictive models. There’s only roughly a hundred years worth of historical reliable seismic information. That’s why we need to rely on other data like paleoseismic studies.
|
|
|
What about predicting based on where they hit? I used to notice they would hit Mexico then alaska then Idaho
|
|
|
Dam earthquake?
It's not a good idea to be downstream from a dam during an earthquake.
|
|
|
Lord forbids a girl trip and falls...
Now everyone's screaming about an earthquake..
Im not THAT big am i? Lol jk
|
|
|
Locations of where they occur depends on the tectonic environment. Alaska and Mexico are highly active because of their proximity to subduction zones and plate margins. We can predict that there will be quakes there based on that fact. But we cannot predict individual quakes just because other quakes are happening. Just like here in CA, we know a quake will rip through the San Andreas one day. What day? That’s the hard part.
|
|
|
Never be below a damn dam in an earthquake.
|
| There are 13 comments on this blog. |
