| There are 24 comments on this blog. |
|
|
There are various reasons, this blog might help add some insight.
There is also something called ANA that is discussed in the attached blog.
Hope this helps some.
|
|
|
Okay understood now. Im doing it now
|
|
|
Ratings to me are whatever. The whole rating system can be used and abused. It’s just a way to see who saw who and who to PM. That’s it.
If I rate someone I don’t expect her to rate me back. I crack up when people get all petty about that shit.
|
|
|
I'm getting spanked by ANA. Due to not receiving ratings from whom I've seen lately (pretty much zero rate backs this year) I am unable to rate tonight's rendezvous. I always rate, if I choose to rate, on the same day. Just as an info marker to help me remember.
My system is now broken and it's bothering the anal retentive side of me.
|
|
|
That’s what I didn’t understand but a few people took it personal . Anyways sorry if it offended anyone xxoo
|
|
|
It's supposed to be Customary. You know, like tipping your Lyft driver. 
But I suppose if you don't want to see them again, then don't.
Pride and Ego's can be to much for some. But I shouldn't talk cause I'm already there.
And not everyone is the others cup of tea. So don't get stuck in the walls of your own mind.
.
|
|
|
"Ratings to me are whatever. The whole rating system can be used and abused."
Don't be this guy. He likes to rate and then pull back ratings, his compliance level (hover over that Level 3 by his handle) is -2, that is telling. The ratings system can work if you use it correctly and know how to read between the lines like with this dipshit (see link).
|
|
|
LOL. I do my own research and ask my own questions. I can tell you that the providers who have questions about my negatives can ask me and I am always straight up.
I don’t need to get into anything here but suffice it to say I find ratings here to be overblown in their importance and that a good percentage of “safe” ratings are bullshit and fabricated by bookers or shill/throwaway accounts.
Another portion is those who rate them safe but use that as a way to say “PM me and I will tell you how badly the session went.”
Safe doesn’t mean anything other than you answered the questions a certain way. It certainly doesn’t reflect on whether the ad and pics were accurate, the description in communication was accurate, etc.
And when you rate someone as unsafe because they rip you off (the theft question) you are vilified for rating them unsafe. LOL. Like I said…not that useful.
I don’t care what Level someone is. If there are a lot of negatives then you ask. But lots of positives doesn’t mean it’s gonna be remotely close to as represented.
|
|
|
Cool if you relish your flawless positive and Level 4 status. IDGAF. 
|
|
|
How does someone get negative on compliance ?
Also, how do you rated someone a bad karma?
I havent understand ratings much, levels might not matter but safety is important and that what makes HX great
|
|
|
Answer the questions completely honestly and let the chips fall where they may.
Also, she has 24 inbound safety ratings vs 22 outbound. That shouldn’t trigger ANA to lock down her ability to rate others. ANA only does so when the ratio is obscene.
|
|
|
I was at about 71 out to 49 in & couldn't rate. Two rated me back on request & I was able to outbound. I wonder how close I am to the edge now.
|
|
|
I wish I could help you with this. The men usually get upset cause then they can’t trick the other girls into seeing them if they’re rated poorly since they’re network has reds.
I’ve noticed when you rate them negatively even if they did something they shouldn't have they
retaliate with a bad rating for you and then go and blog about how horrible you are in the men’s blogs.
I'm sure it goes for the girls on here as well.
The rating system in hx is poorly set up.
I’ve had men threaten to talk bad about me on the blogs cause I reported them harmful when I should have called the cops on them!
There are a lot of men in the site that ask for unsafe things so stay safe out there ladies!
|
|
|
The rating system simply asks the wrong questions and compiles the answers in an illogical manner.
There is no clear definition what karma means. There is no clear definition when integrity means. There is no clear definition on a lot of the terms and you don’t know what they mean so it doesn’t mean anything to anyone.
Like I said, the best thing that the rating system does is tell you who saw who on what day. And that leaves some kind of electronic trail so that you can message people and ask them what really happened in terms of their interaction.
Just because someone rates someone safe doesn’t mean that it was a positive experience. Like I said, I’ve gotten many responses from other clients who rated a provider positively as far as safety, but had nothing good to say about the session.
That’s why I don’t put very much stock in the rating system. It does have some value, but not nearly the value that it is purported to have. Like I said, someone could be marked as safe in terms of they’re not going to harm you or steal from you, but that doesn’t mean that they are who they represent who they are or that there is any integrity to their representation.
There is at least responder on this thread who I could cite as guilty of that but the rating system simply doesn’t ask the question that would identify that.
That’s why all the hubbub about rating people seem so overblown to me
|
|
|
Here’s an example.
One of the questions you’re asked is has so-and-so ever made commitments to you? You can’t answer always, never, yes and I believe sometimes.
So let’s interpret that question as has someone ever made commitments to you about the session or her appearance in photos?
If the photos are not real or representative, or the representation of the session is not accurate, how is that reflected in the ratings?
It’s totally unclear
Going beyond safety, my concern would be is this person representing herself properly?
The rating system does a poor job of actually answering that question
|
|
|
That’s why most of the PMs I see are questions about appearance, and the representation of the session. In other words, the question is, does she look like her photos? Does she honor her menu?
If the rating system were so clear, no one would need to ask these questions
|
|
|
Thats why I didnt understand the questions,. some of them had nothing to do with saftey . However , I rated everyone back since it was an issues. I was told I had alot of bad reviews and " and goodluck" i was going to need it on her  . Strange
|
|
|
Yeah to me it makes no sense what questions they ask and it is so unclear what “karma” or “compliance” really means.
As Randy said, just answer honestly.
But I find the ratings fairly useless except for knowing who saw who and who to contact for more info.
|
|
|
From what I have seen…I think you do just fine. There will always be people who complain and who you can’t make happy but I saw you and everything was as you represented. Plus you were safe.
|
|
|
Everyone can have an opinion about ratings.
Some rate consistently, some don't.
Some prefer quicky 2 second ratings, I've never given one.
What I see is a lot of jealousy...
I see someone, and give them a rating.
I'll get flak in a PM, like "I was available, you saw HER?"
"Did you forget me, why didn't you contact me?"
So, I stopped giving out ratings. I wasn't getting rated in return, so no loss...
Giving a rating could be a subjective thing. Based on impulse or feelings. It's not personal, don't make it more than what it is.
Well, that's my 2¢ on that subject. Ratings have no effect on your profile. And beware of the ANA.
|
|
|
^^
Agreed 100%.
|
|
|
I use the rating system primarily for two things:1) are they safe for me to see and not get robbed, and 2) are they safe to see and not get caught (in a le sting). As far as all the other stuff, that can be hash out between two consenting adults. Just like all my relationships on here, honesty and integrity are very high characteristics on my list. Happy Holidays!
|
|
|
@occityboy2 whats ANA?
|
|
|
AUTOMATIC NETWORK AUDITOR.
the system looks at HOW MANY people YOU rated,
And compares that to HOW MANY people RATED you.
Like if you rated 10 people, but only 5 rated you back, the ANA will stop you from rating more people. Also, the ANA will lower your COMPLIANCE rating to (-1, -2...). That causes unknown things. I know, because I was there once, down to a (-3)!
|
| There are 24 comments on this blog. |
