| There are 17 comments on this blog. |
|
|
Side note: he actually had a good rating for me this entire time, and it only changed after I said I wasn’t comfortable leaving a review months later
|
|
|
I've reported that man so many times
Not only is he a haggler and tried to get rates that are disturbingly low but I still have the texts where he told me that he was going to get me pregnant and was rude and belittling after I said no. Few months later he messaged me and I'm like who is this and he goes "kingkong, you're supposed to have my baby"
I haven't blocked anyone so damn fast because ugh
I'm sorry you had to deal with that. He's a weirdo
|
|
|
Omg this is bringing back more memories now June… I remember him saying the same thing to me about “having his baby” im glad to know im not the only one and that I didn’t give in to rating him when he was pressuring me to
|
|
|
man, the desperation in those texts is just pitiful. what a ridiculous waste of time.
|
|
|
I’m calling BS on that dude. One unreturned rating is NOT going to bring ANA into the picture. ANA is an automated tool that compares the inbound vs outbound network of every profile. Theoretically, it should be 1:1. That is for every outbound rating, one inbound exists. If the ratio is too far out of whack, (usually more out than in,) it prevents any new network ratings from being created from that profile until either one of two things happen: either the number of outbound ratings is deleted or inbound ratings is increased. And one missing inbound rating (which is what he texts is mission) is not enough to trigger her.
|
|
|
Also may I just add that he's a liar because one rating is not going to disrupt the system
He just wants an updated rating so that he can be shady to another lady. Why wait a year to reach out? Also he could have easily deleted his rating if there was a system issue
I've always told people levels and positive ratings don't mean anything. He's a level 4 and I wouldn't see that man even if he did have the $$
Actually I wouldn't see that man if I had a clone to do it for me lol no thanks
|
|
|
Thank you for clarifying that because what he was saying honestly didn’t make sense to me either. If it’s true that he’s still able to receive or leave ratings now, then clearly his current issues with the site have nothing to do with me. That’s why I found it strange he was putting pressure on me over it. I already explained to him that if he’s experiencing technical problems or account complications, that’s something he needs to take up directly with HX, because I have no control over the platform or his account access.
|
|
|
If you have a bad experience with someone but it doesn't rise to the level of a safety issue requiring you to rate him red in safety, you should still add him to your network. When you answer the karma question "Do you like _____________?" you have three choices.
Yes - green
No - Red
He's alright - blank
If there was something you didn't really like about him, but he was okay, you would press He's alright.
If he did things that upset you and you definitely wouldn't see him again, you would press No.
Any way you answer the questions, you will add him to your network. That is the most important part because other members see your recent rating and can pm you to ask bout him.
If you're concerned about a retaliatory red for rating him red in karma, just leave it blank. Then warn anyone asking about the manner in which he conducted himself.
The more information is shared on this site, the safer and friendlier it becomes because those who are trying to take advantage are exposed for what they're doing, and others avoid them also.
|
|
|
Easily solved if u did a 2 minute rating
|
|
|
Again…no one except Tom knows what fucking questions are karma, compliance, etc.
Ratings are laughable. So many providers are rated as safe and the resulting PMs from the raters are “nah, don’t. Pics are 30 lbs and 10 years ago, but yeah, she is safe.” LOL.
|
|
|
safety = did i feel threatened? seems like you weren't robbed or he did anything to you outside your wishes so he's safe. that's all he wanted. he's hunting for lv 5 status
the other ones you can rate negative/or neutral depending on your responses. again the 2 minute rating covers all this
solution is to re rate him properly. he will do the same. ezpz. then we can have peace in the middle east..... 
|
|
|
Even if I had left an honest rating about the experience, it feels like it would’ve been a lose-lose situation because I was concerned he would retaliate with a negative review anyway. I also didn’t want him in my network after the way he pressured me over ratings, which is why I asked for the rating to be removed in the first place.
With all of that being said, I don’t understand why he’s suddenly contacting me nearly a year later claiming I’m the reason he can’t issue or receive reviews. If he’s having technical issues with the site, that’s something he would need to address directly with support, not me.
At the end of the day, I simply did not want him in my network, and the pressure and bullying around leaving a rating did not sit right with me at all.
|
|
|
A few missing inbound ratings is to be expected as not everyone rates back. But tons more outgoing than incoming ratings is usually a flag to dig deeper.
|
|
|
thing is some girls want to stay a low level so they don't want ratings but they will give. gonna be issues with the system either way
|
|
|
KinggKongg has received 82 safety ratings and 86 Karma ratings. He has issued 98 ratings. So it may be that he did get the ANA alert when trying to rate someone new.
That said, CJ's comment above is correct. He could wait to receive a new rating and then would be able to rate back, or he could remove a rating or two from people who haven't rated him back. He already knows how to do this because he has removed ratings nearly 30 times over the years
If he forgot, he should see the screenshot below and use the red X icon next to the people he wants to remove ratings from.
|
|
|
I understand where Tasty is coming from. Women are competing for clients and negatives are a ding and could hurt business. I don’t think she should be dinged for not leaving a negative.
Sometimes it’s just better to let sleeping dogs lie. Like right now I have a dispute with someone else but it’s not an issue I feel involves anyone else and to leave her a negative would do what? Nothing. It was a shitty outcome but that’s it.
|
|
|
And no…outbound vs. inbound ratings mismatch is a nothingburger. Absolutely zero. Just means you can’t rate if they don’t rate back. So fucking what? Jesus. You clowns think this shit is like a rare Pokemon or something.
|
| There are 17 comments on this blog. |
