| There are 25 comments on this blog. |
|
|
Oh I forgot another thing to support “fight cancer” there better now
|
|
|
Thanks for posting, I haven't been keeping up.
Dunno if this is a smart.... or a dumb move on his part if he has national ambitions.
|
|
|
Hand guns should be ok
|
|
|
they still are technically
but sounds like theyre going to change some parts on the inside
people will just find new ways around things tho
|
|
|
Ok let’s get into the real reason this statute was enacted. Newsome doesn’t like Glocks because they won’t conform with California’s onerous weapon safety requirements. Glock hasn’t really changed its fundamental design for years( if it ain’t broke don’t fix it)however, it has made different versions of their firearms. Gen 3 Glock are currently available for sale in California(till July 2026)however new versions Gen 4, 5 etc have never been available for common citizens in California because Glock refuses to comply with all the really unnecessary safety measures.. What makes no sense to any of this is you can buy ANY USED version of Glocks or LEO can purchase them. So because Gen 3 Glocks were being sold in California before the safety regulations California couldn’t stop Glock from producing the older version and continue to sell it new in California until July 2026.
Now why this is really a nonsensical statute? California and Federal statutes both ban fully automatic firearms and you can’t even possess parts to convert any firearm to fully automatic.
|
|
|
If anyone has ever tried to fire a fully automatic small pistol (not a machine pistol like a Mini or Micro Uzi), you'd know this is silly. You couldn't hit the side of a barn fro 50 feet after the first round!
|
|
|
Glock just announced a new model and plans to retire Gen 3-5. Word is they’re already working on a CA Conpliant version of the next gen model and it should be ready for CADOJ approval in 2026.
|
|
|
Smh, 2nd Amendment was ratified in 1791. A semi-auto that can become full auto very easily is dangerous. There's plenty to choose from on the ca hangun roster, and plenty of time to buy a Glock, they're cheap $500.
|
|
|
This video is a good summary on it. More CA BS! I am glad I have a FL address so I can bypass this!
|
|
|
The trump supreme court will overturn.
|
|
|
yellowB2....
You do know that probably 90% of the legislators in California who pass these laws do not own a gun and may have never fired any type of weapon, whether a hand-gun or rifle.
So, they don't know shit about what they are talking about. It sounds good and they jump up and down saying they will be resolved gun violence.
Of course, if you look nationally, that number rises quickly, since other states are not as stupid as CA. I think our current legislature (House and Senate) have over 100 gun owners. Of course, that includes all of the red state politicians.
|
|
|
@SmartK9 - I am sorry but you are incorrect on one part. After the ban goes into place you cannot private party sell / transfer your Glock or buy a used one. Same process. As the Assembly Bill 1127 states "This bill would prohibit a licensed firearms dealer to sell, offer for sale, exchange, give, transfer, or deliver any semiautomatic convertible pistol, except as specified."
As all private party sales have to go through a FFL already. This would prohibit the Private Party Sale / Transfer.
The term I am curious about is the "GIVE" part as a Intra-familial transfer, Grandparent or Parent to Child bypasses the Roster and does not require a FFL Transfer. They love making super vague verbage.
The other Bill's he signed that day are either just as dumb or even scarier.
Assembly Bill 1078 - makes several provisions to Californias firearm laws, most notably, limiting residents to three firearm purchases within a 30-day period. California previously enacted a one-gun-a-month law, which a U.S. District Court struck down as unconstitutional.
Assembly Bill 1263 - creates a new crime for knowingly or willfully causing another person to unlawfully manufacture a firearm. What the H E Double Hockey sticks does that mean?
Senate Bill 704 - requires firearm barrels to be sold or transferred only through licensed dealers and with a background check. Currently we need to register the serial numbered part, usually lower. We also need to do background check for ammo purchases, *PSST* They are keeping track *COUGH*.
So they just keep widdling away at us, Bill by Bill.
|
|
|
Don't comply. Defy.
|
|
|
@depth sorry but you are mistaken .
|
|
|
I'd like a G43.
Yeah, I know I can buy used, but I'll wait till I move out of state in a few years (retirement)
|
|
|
look at china, guns are illegal, nearly 0 crime, 0 mass shootings, 0 gun homicides
|
|
|
So move to China and stfu
|
|
|
aznboytoi
There's no crime in China?
You are one funny guy.
I guess you never heard of the Communist Chinese Party.
You do something they don't like and they shoot you.
Or you just disappear forever.
There is no trial. The people have no rights.
|
|
|
You can ban the sale of every gun under the sun & there will still be millions owned. That 'zero guns' idea left the barn and can't come back.
Aznboi - turn in your Asian card; no stupid here.
|
|
|
They probably hate Glocks because it's so easy to convert them to select fire.
A US$50 device.
Google a patent by Jorge Leon.
M/AR's only need a US$20 lightning link.
|
|
|
U.S. v. Ali Danial Hemani look who is pushing that one into SCOTUS and states where they made it legal for medical and recreational vegetables aren't the ones involved.
|
|
|
who needs a fully automatic gun, seriously?
|
|
|
^^^
Who needs an full auto?
Let me address that indirectly.
The folks that are left of center traditionally have been less supportive of the second amendment than those on the right side of the political isle.
Now that Trump is in office, and sending ICE agents out, sending national guard troops to Portland, Chicago etc, now, all of a sudden, you see much more support of the ability for citizenry to be able to defend themselves, with many politicians wanting to out law enforcement identity, tracking their movements, and some to 'defend' themselves by shooting LE.
to my knowledge, only Fetterman (senator, Penn) has refused to call Trump Hitler & a fascist.
Pretty much every other Democrat has called Trump a threat to democracy.
Some politicians have (indirectly) praised the assassination attempts of Trump & the real assassination of Charlie Kirk.
With that as context - you do the math.
It's nice to see the left support the second amendment, I'm on the other side of the political isle & I find their rhetoric deplorable (if you forgive the expression).
I could go on, but I hope you got the meaning.
|
|
|
🤣🤣I clicked on this blog because I thought it said our POS Governor banned clocks. It is in fact not clocks.
Sorry, carry on
|
|
|
Another day where the King of California controls the people?
|
| There are 25 comments on this blog. |
