| There are 8 comments on this blog. |
|
|
One acre-foot is equal to 325,851 gallons of water.
Averaging 3000 acre feet a day = 97,755,300 gallons a day.
|
|
|
There’s no potential profit in doing the right thing.
|
|
|
So I'm not sure, but the empty Santa Ynez Reservoir is located in Pacific Palisades and I don't think it's feed by Lake Cachuma in Santa Barbara County. Although Lake Cachuma after the last rainy seasons is at 98% capacity so there's no water issue here
|
|
|
It's too bad that the things that could have been done weren't. Instead there are several things that could/should have been done, identified only after the worst that can happen does, like it has many times in the past.
Isn't it SOMEBODY'S multi-6 figure taxpayer job to know and plan for things. From the ones with the obvious title to do the job to the ones that should rattle some cages when they don't have what they will need. I've always hated the ribbon cutting 'faces' who foster a go-along-to-get-along management style and don't have the balls (so to speak) to move without a complete consensus. Such managers and heads didn't last long.
I've sat in so many department heads and director's meetings where if anyone, anyone, spoke a word of non-agreement the issue was tabled until the next month's meeting, with a directive for anyone to research and bring more info to it.
|
|
|
^ without
|
|
|
Don't ever let a good crisis go to waste.
Welcome to LA Smart 2.0 city
Gavin Newsom Announces Plan To Enact Permanent Emergency Rule Over Los Angeles & Establish "LA 2.0"
How The Palisades Neighborhood Will Be Transformed Into An Agenda 2030 Smart City Under UN Regulations, Administered & Owned By The OECD
.
|
|
|
i'd say pretty poor planning
and the ribbon cutter politicians - none worse, they are first on the spot when there is a camera and something to announce but when there is a real issue they stick their heads in the sand.
now we will see how they can deal with a housing crisis.
|
|
|
It's such a bad joke when these idiots end up making heroes of themselves by proclaiming how they're going to fix the problem they should have fixed before the disaster. Despite their assembled pundits applauding their announcements it doesn't actually happen.
Who cares anyway? The next time probably won't happen until they're out of that office.
|
| There are 8 comments on this blog. |